11. In November 1995, we twice invoked Rule 39.8 to deny Attwood in forma pauperis status. 12. To proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 13. Further herein in forma pauperis is granted. 14. In November 1995, we twice invoked Rule 39 . 8 to deny Attwood in forma pauperis status. 15. And since October 1992, we have invoked Rule 39.8 five times to deny Jones in forma pauperis status. 16. Approximately two-thirds of writ of certiorari petitions to the Supreme Court are filed " in forma pauperis ". 17. Pro se petitioner Sylvester Jones requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. 18. Pro se petitioner Robert Attwood requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. 19. Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. 20. And since October 1992, we have invoked Rule 39 . 8 five times to deny Jones in forma pauperis status.
