Strangely, as “Old Europe” finds its backbone, the Anglosphere quivers. So awful was the American government reaction, it won the endorsement of the country's leading Islamist organization, the Council on American-Islamic Relations . This should come as no great surprise, however, for Washington has a history of treating Islam preferentially . On two earlier occasions it also faltered in cases of insults concerning Muhammad. In 1989, Salman Rushdie came under a death edict from Ayatollah Khomeini for satirizing Muhammad in his magical-realist novel, The Satanic Verses . Rather than stand up for the novelist's life, President George H.W. Bush equated The Satanic Verses and the death edict, calling both “offensive.” The then secretary of state, James A. Baker III, termed the edict merely “regrettable.” आश्चर्य है कि प्राचीन यूरोप के रीढ़ की हड्डी सीधी हो रही है लेकिन अमेरिकी सरकार की प्रतिक्रिया दुखद रही है .इस प्रतिक्रिया के बाद सरकार को देश के अग्रणी इस्लामवादी संगठन काउंसिल ऑन अमेरिकन इस्लामिक रिलेश्न्स का भी समर्थन मिल गया. वैसे यह कोई आश्चर्य का विषय नहीं है क्योंकि इस्लाम को प्राथिमकता देने का वाशिंगटन का अपना इतिहास रहा है . इससे पहले भी दो मौंकों पर मोहम्मद के अपमान के विषय पर इसने जल्दबाजी दिखाई है.
32.
If the advisory board is not the ideal solution, it is the best to be hoped for at the moment, given the power of the higher-education lobby. I am ready to give H.R. 3077 a chance. But should the board not come into existence or fail to make a difference, I'll advocate the better solution - defunding - and work to spread these ideas among the public and in Congress. My opponents will then learn what happens when truly I am “actively pushing” for Congress to adopt a measure. Comment by Martin Kramer in his “ Sandbox ” commentary: Pipes on HR3077 . Daniel Pipes devotes his column this morning to HR3077. Reminder: the bill would create an advisory board for the Title VI program of government subsidies to area studies at universities. The bill's radical opponents, especially Arab and Muslim advocacy groups, have portrayed Pipes as a prime initiator or backer of the bill. But Pipes, who now serves on the board of the U.S. Institute of Peace, and once served on the Fulbright board, hasn't been a great believer in HR3077. Nor has he been an activist for it. Truth is, he doesn't think much of such boards. Pipes would rather defund Title VI, or divert its post-9/11 windfall to an alternative network of centers devoted to terrorism studies. For now, he's willing to give the board idea a chance. Since I strongly support HR3077, I'm grateful for his endorsement, however reserved. But if the board isn't created, or fails to effect any change, he promises to launch a defunding campaign. Should that happen, I'll be right behind him. Tue, Feb 24 2004 9:45 am Related Topics: Academia , Middle East studies , US politics receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item यदि सलाहकार बोर्ड उपयुक्त समाधान नहीं है तो मेरी दृष्टि में उच्च शिक्षा लाबी को कुछ समय के लिये इसका अधिकार दिया जाना चाहिये। मैं H.R 3077 को एक अवसर देने के पक्ष में हूँ और इसके लिये कांग्रेस और लोगों में जनमत बनाने का आग्रह करूँगा । तब मेरे विरोधियों को पता चलेगा कि कांग्रेस को एक समाधान के साथ सक्रिय रूप से कार्य करने का क्या असर होना है।
33.
The Institute, in accordance with its Congressional mandate, and as requested by the Administration, is focusing on the full range of issues associated with relations between the United States on the one hand, and the varied countries of the Muslim world on the other hand. Institute programming does not represent endorsement of particular views. Our events intentionally bring together those of differing perspectives to highlight critical issues and provide guidance to policymakers. That said, there are clear limits regarding whom we will allow to use the Institute's podium. Advocates of violence are among those we would refuse to provide a platform. Again, we appreciate your having taken the time to contact us with your concerns. Kay King Director, Congressional and Public Affairs U.S. Institute of Peace Related Topics: Muslims in the United States , Radical Islam , USIP receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item यह संस्थान प्रशासन के आग्रह और कांग्रेस की मान्यता से एक ओर अमेरिका में परस्पर सम्बन्धों तथा दूसरी ओर मुस्लिम विश्व के विविध देशों के मध्य परस्पर सम्बन्धों से जुड़े समस्त विषयों पर प्रकाश डालता है. संस्थान का कार्यक्रम किसी विशेष दृष्टिकोण को आगे नहीं बढ़ाता. हमारे कार्यक्रमों के द्वारा विभिन्न दृष्टिकोणों को एक साथ लाया जाता है ताकि नाजुक विषयों को रेखांकित कर नीति निर्माताओं का मार्गदर्शन किया जा सके. इस बात की सीमायें हैं कि हम किन लोगों को संस्थान के मंच का उपयोग करने देंगे. हिंसा की वकालत करने वाले उनमें से हैं जिन्हें मंच प्रदान नहीं किया जायेगा. एक बार फिर अपनी चिन्ताओं से हमें अवगत कराने के हम आपकी सरराहना करते हैं.
How to say endorsement in Hindi and what is the meaning of endorsement in Hindi? endorsement Hindi meaning, translation, pronunciation, synonyms and example sentences are provided by Hindlish.com.
