Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney rightly retorted that “It's disgraceful that the Obama administration's first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.” This argument has very large implications, not so much for the elections (Iran is the key foreign policy issue there) but because such weakness incites Islamists again to attack, both to close down criticism of Islam and to impose one aspect of Shari'a, or Islamic law, on the West. Terry Jones, Sam Bacile, and their future imitators know how to goad Muslims to violence, embarrass Western governments, and move history. In response, Islamists know how to exploit Jones, et al. The only way to stop this cycle is for governments to stand firmly on principle: “Citizens have freedom of speech, which specifically means the right to insult and annoy. The authorities will protect this right. Muslims do not enjoy special privileges but are subject to the same free-speech rules as everyone else. Leave us alone.” अभी तक 2012 के आक्रमण के चलते 4 अमेरिकी लोगों की मृत्यु हुई है और सम्भव है कि यह आगे और बढे। जोन्स (अपने International Judge Muhammad Day के द्वारा) और सैम बैसिले ( जो कि सम्भवतः अस्तित्व में न हो परंतु जिन पर आरोप है कि उन्होंने ही इस्लाम विरोधी वीडियो बनाकर 11 सितम्बर के इस बार के आक्रमण को प्रेरित किया) न केवल लोगों के लिये मृत्यु की स्थिति निर्माण कर सकते हैं वरन अमेरिका और मिस्र के सम्बंधों में टकराव ला सकते हैं और अमेरिका के राष्ट्रपति चुनावों में एक तत्व बन सकते हैं।
42.
[British prime minister] Tony Blair unintentionally revealed his ignorance when he said, in an effort to conciliate Muslims, that he had “read through the Koran twice” and that he kept it by his bedside. He thought he was saying something which showed how seriously he took Islam. But most Muslims thought it was a joke, if not an insult. Because, of course, every Muslim knows that you cannot read the Koran through from cover to cover and understand it. The chapters are not written to be read in that way. Indeed, after the first chapter, the chapters of the Koran are ordered according to their length, not according to their content or chronology: the longest chapters are first, the shorter ones are at the end. You need to know which passage was revealed at what period and in what time in order to be able to understand it - you cannot simply read it from beginning to end and expect to learn anything at all. That is one reason why it takes so long to be able to read and understand the Koran: the meaning of any part of it depends on a knowledge of its context - a context that is not in the Koran itself.. केवल कुरान को पढ़ने से हम उन तथ्यों का विकास नहीं समझ पाते जिनका विकास पुस्तक के दायरे से बाहर हुआ है . संक्षेप में कुरान कोई इतिहास की पुस्तक नहीं है . इतिहास की पुस्तक का अपना अलग ही महत्व होता है . जो भी उग्रवादी इस्लाम और उसके द्वारा प्रेरित हिंसा का अध्ययन करना चाहता है उसे वहाबी आंदोलन ,खोमैनी क्रांति और अलकायदा को समझना चाहिए . मुस्लविम धर्म शास्त्र से अधिक मुस्लिम इतिहास इस बात की व्याख्या कर सकता है कि हम यहाँ तक कैसे पहुँचे और आगे क्या होने वाला है.
43.
Should Westerners accept this imbalance, the dhimmi status will follow. This Islamic concept permits “people of the book,” monotheists such as Christians and Jews, to continue to practice their religion under Muslim rule, subject to many restrictions. For its time, the dhimmi status offered certain benefits (until as recently as 1945, Jews generally had better lives in Islamdom than in Christendom), but it is intended to insult and humiliate non-Muslims, even as it exalts Muslims' superiority. Dhimmi s pay additional taxes, may not join the military or the government, and suffer from encompassing legal disabilities. In some times and places, dhimmi s could ride on a donkey but not on a horse, wore distinctive clothing, and an elderly dhimmi on the street was required to jump out of the way of a Muslim child. Elements of the dhimmi status have recently been applied in such varied places as Gaza, the West Bank, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Clearly, Londonistan and beyond are also in their sights. क्या पश्चिमी लोगों को इस असंतुलन को स्वीकार करना चाहिये, इससे तो धिम्मी स्थिति बरकरार रहेगी। इस इस्लामी अवधारणा के अनुसार , “ पुस्तकीय लोग” एकेश्वरवादी जैसे ईसाई और यहूदी मुस्लिम शासन में अपने मजहब का पालन करें और उन पर अनेक अवरोध भी होंगे। इस समय में धिम्मी स्थिति के अनेक लाभ भी हैं ( 1945 तक यहूदी ईसाई क्षेत्र की अपेक्षा इस्लाम क्षेत्र में अधिक सुविधायें प्राप्त करते थे)परंतु इसका प्रमुख आशय गैर मुस्लिमों को अपमानित और लाँक्षित करना है और यहाँ तक कि यह मुस्लिम सर्वोच्चता को स्थापित करना है।
44.
Sep. 25, 2012 update : After a full two weeks of embarrassing mumbo-jumbo on the matter of freedom of expression Barack Obama used his speech to the United Nations at first lengthily to lambast the Innocence of Muslims (“crude and disgusting … an insult not only to Muslims, but to America”) and then, at last, to provide a robust defense of the American way: there are some who ask why we don't just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views - even views that we disagree with. जहाँ तक ओबामा प्रशासन का प्रश्न है तो वह अपने तुष्टीकरण और क्षमाप्रार्थी भाव के अनुसार ही कार्रवाई कर रहा है और इसने इस्लाम के आलोचकों को दोषी ठहराया है। “ काइरो में अमेरिका के दूतावास ने कुछ दिग्भ्रमित लोगों द्वारा मुसलमानों की धार्मिक भावनाओं को भडकाने के लगातार प्रयास की निंदा की .... हम उन लोगों के कार्य को अस्वीकार करते हैं जो कि अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतन्त्रता के वैश्विक अधिकार का दुरूपयोग दूसरों की धार्मिक आस्था को ठेस पहुँचाने के लिये कर रहे हैं” । इसके उपरांत विदेश मंत्री हिलेरी क्लिंटन ( अमेरिका दूसरों की धार्मिक भावनाओं को ठेस पहुँचाने के किसी भी अन्तरराष्ट्रीय प्रयास की निंदा करता है) और बराक ओबामा( अमेरिका दूसरों की धार्मिक भावना को नीचा दिखाने के प्रयासों की निंदा करता है) ने आरम्भिक घुटने टेकने के रुझान को पुष्ट कर दिया।
45.
This segues to a second goal - Muslim supremacy and Western inferiority. Islamists routinely say and do things more offensive to Westerners than anything Westerners do vis-à-vis Muslims. They openly despise Western culture; in the words of an Algerian Islamist, it's not a civilization, but a “ syphilization .” Their mainstream media publishes coarser, viler, and more violent cartoons than anything commissioned by Flemming Rose. They freely insult Judaism , Christianity , Hinduism , and Buddhism . They murder Jews just for being Jews, like Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, Sébastian Sellam and Ilan Halimi in France, and Pamela Waechter and Ariel Sellouk in the United States. Whether because of fear or inattention, Westerners assent to an imbalance whereby Muslims may offend and attack while they themselves are shielded from any such indignities or pains. इसी में दूसरा लक्ष्य छुपा हुआ है- मुस्लिम प्रभुता और पश्चिमी हीनभावना। इस्लामवादी सामान्य रूप से पश्चिम के विरुद्ध आक्रामक ढंग से व्यवहार करते हैं जबकि ऐसा इस्लाम के प्रति पश्चिम के मामले में नहीं है। वे पश्चिमी संस्कृति के विरुद्ध खुले रूप में अवमानना परक बाते करते हैं जैसा कि अल्जीरिया के एक इस्लामवादी ने इसके विरुद्ध अश्लील बात कही। उनका मुख्यधारा का मीडिया ऐसे आक्रामक कार्टून प्रकाशित करता है जिसके मुकाबले फ्लेमिंग रोज का कार्टून कुछ नहीं है। वे खुले रूप में यहूदी, ईसाई, हिन्दू और बौद्ध को अपमानित करते हैं। वे यहूदियों को केवल इसलिये मारते हैं कि वे यहूदी हैं जैसा कि पाकिस्तान में डैनियल पर्ल को मार दिया गया, फ्रांस में सेबेस्टैयन सेलाम और इलान हलीमी को और संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका में पामेला वेचर और एरियल सेलोक को। चाहे पश्चिमी लोग ध्यान न देते हों या फिर भयभीत रहते हों कि वे असंतुलन को सहन कर जाते हैं कि जब मुस्लिम पश्चिमी लोगों पर आक्रमण कर जाते हैं जबकि स्वयं ऐसे किसी आक्रमण से बच जाते हैं।
46.
Dominate Egypt? If the military colludes with Islamists to remain in power, obviously it, and not Islamists retains ultimate control. This is the key point that conventional analysts miss: the recent election results allow the military to keep power . As aspiring Egyptian politician Mohamed ElBaradei correctly notes, “it is all in the hands of SCAF right now.” True, if Islamists control the parliament (not a sure thing; the military could yet decide to reduce their percentage in future rounds of an unusually complex voting procedure open to abuse), they acquire certain privileges and move the country further toward the Shari'a - as far, anyway, as SCAF permits. This maintains the long-term trend of Islamization underway since the military seized power in 1952. What about Western policy? First, press SCAF to build the civil society that must precede real democracy, so that the modern and moderate civilians in Egypt have a chance to express themselves. Second, instantly cease all economic aid to Cairo. It is unacceptable that Western taxpayers pay, even indirectly, for Islamizing Egypt. Resume funding only when the government allows secular Muslims, liberals, and Copts, among others, freely to express and organize themselves. Third, oppose both the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis. Less extreme or more, Islamists of every description are our worst enemies. Mr. Pipes ( www.DanielPipes.org ) is president of the Middle East Forum and Taube fellow at the Hoover Institution. Ms Farahat is an Egyptian activist and co-author of a book about the Tahrir Square protests. A man walks by a graffito that proclaims “No to military rule,” crosses out a picture of military dictator Mohamed at-Tantawi and calls him a “fag.” Dec. 6, 2011 addendum : The text above refers to the USSR but Russia held elections two days ago that the U.S. secretary of state denounced for their “electoral fraud and manipulation.” At least they don't insult everyone's intelligence with 99-percent results. Egypt's military rulers said Wednesday that they would control the process of writing a constitution and maintain authority over the interim government to check the power of Islamists who have taken a commanding lead in parliamentary elections. मिस्र पर नियंत्रण? यदि सेना सत्ता में बने रहने के लिये इस्लामवादियों के साथ समझौता करती है जो कि ऐसा करेगी और इस्लामवादी अंतिम रूप से पूरा नियंत्रण स्थापित नहीं करते। यह मुख्य बिंदु है जिसे कि परम्परागत विश्लेषक भूल जा रहे हैं: हाल के चुनाव परिणाम से सेना को सत्ता पर नियंत्रण का अवसर मिलता है। जैसा कि मिस्रके उदीयमान राजनेता मोहम्मद अल बरदेयी ने सही ही कहा है, “ अभी तो सब कुछ एससीएसएफ के हाथ में है”।
How to say insult in Hindi and what is the meaning of insult in Hindi? insult Hindi meaning, translation, pronunciation, synonyms and example sentences are provided by Hindlish.com.
