1. The fraudulent transfers were made to international accounts, including banks in Latvia. 2. Unlike the intentional fraudulent transfer , no intention to defraud is necessary. 3. Ultimately, the Bank was able to block US $ 243, 46 of the fraudulent transfers . 4. The archetypal example is the intentional fraudulent transfer . 5. The second is a constructive fraudulent transfer . 6. This requirement is consistent with the fact that transmutations are subject to the laws governing fraudulent transfers . 7. First, there are federal and state Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act which defines what constitutes a fraudulent transfer. 8. There are two kinds of fraudulent transfer . 9. Accordingly, it found that the bank was not liable for the losses resulting from the fraudulent transfers . 10. First, there are federal and state Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act which defines what constitutes a fraudulent transfer .
