हिंदी MobileEnglish
Login Sign Up

opponents sentence in Hindi

"opponents" meaning in Hindiopponents in a sentence
SentencesMobile
  • In this era, a faction of vicious (munafiks) people surfaced amongst the Muslims who acted as Muslims but mingled with the opponents.
    इसी ‎युग में कुटाचारियों (मुनाफिक़ों) का एक गुट मुसलमानों में पैदा हो गया जो ‎मुसलमान होने का नाटक करते और विरोधियों से मिले रहते थे।
  • A growing body of analysts believe that no, the Muslim faith cannot do these things, that these features are inherent to Islam and immutably part of its makeup. Asked if she agrees with my formulation that “radical Islam is the problem, but moderate Islam is the solution,” the writer Ayaan Hirsi Ali replied, “He's wrong. Sorry about that.” She and I stand in the same trench , fighting for the same goals and against the same opponents, but we disagree on this vital point.
    मेरे तर्क के दो भाग हैं । पहला, अनेक विश्लेषकों की राय कि आवश्यक रूप से जो शास्त्रीय स्थिति है वही रहेगी गलत है और दूसरा एक सुधरा हुआ इस्लाम उभर सकता है।
  • That the topic remains open is surprising. Other than objections from a few of us - the New York Sun 's editorialists, its columnist Alicia Colon, the investigative team of Beila Rabinowitz and William A. Meyer, plus my own article and blog on this subject - the school enjoys unflagging support. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helps pay for it. The mayor's office, the Anti-Defamation League , and the United Federation of Teachers endorse it. Newspaper coverage from the New York Times , New York Daily News , Brooklyn Daily Eagle , and International Herald Tribune attempts to discredit us opponents, sometimes stooping to distort our arguments.
    न्यूयार्क शहर के अरबी भाषा स्कूल खलील जिब्रान अंतरराष्ट्रीय अकादमी के खुलने पर अभी भी प्रश्न चिन्ह लगा हुआ है ।
  • This position differs fundamentally from my own , which holds that “radical Islam is the problem, moderate Islam is the solution.” While sharing common opponents, these two outlooks differ on the nature of Islam, its potential for change, and the possibility of allying with Muslims.
    यह स्थिति मूल रूप में मुझसे भिन्न है जिसके अनुसार, “ कट्टरपंथी इस्लाम समस्या है और उदार इस्लाम समाधान है” । सामान्य विरोधियों पर सहमति होते हुए भी इस्लाम के स्वभाव , इसकी परिवर्तित होने की सम्भावना और मुस्लिम लोगों के साथ सहयोग की सम्भावना को लेकर दोनों दृष्टिकोण भिन्न हैं।
  • So, how did some come to discern me as hostile to Islam? I see this resulting from two main developments. Consider the following, from a 1990 article of mine. Although I pooh-poohed the idea of a Muslim threat, I acknowledged that Western Europe (as opposed to the United States) could have problems with Muslim immigration because Europeans “are unprepared for the massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene.” Out of context, this seems to show hostility to Muslims. But my opponents:
    संक्षेप में मेरा कैरियर पूरी तरह मतभेद कम करने और शान्ति लाने को समर्पित रहा। तो कोई कैसे मुझे इस्लाम के प्रति शत्रुवत भाव रखने वाला कह सकता है। मेरी दृष्टि में ऐसा दो कारणों से है।
  • Things are not as they seem. Terrorism hurts radical Islam and helps its opponents. The violence and victims' agony make this hard to see, but without education by murder, the lawful Islamist movement would make greater gains. Aug. 29, 2007 update : For a complementary analysis, where I retreat somewhat from the conclusions reached here and find that “that violence can also strengthen lawful Islamism,” see “ Piggybacking on Terror in Britain .”
    इसी प्रकार लंदन के एक मुसलमान घड़ीसाज ने माना कि यूरोप जब मुसलमानों के हाथ में आ रहा है तो लड़ने की क्या जरुरत .लंदन विश्वविद्यालय के Soumayya Ghannoushi कटुता भरे स्वर में इशारा करता है कि अल- कायदा की सबसे बड़ी उपलब्धि बेगुनाहों के खून बहाना और इस्लाम तथा मुसलमानों के विरुद्ध नफरत की भावना को हवा देना रही है .
  • Wilders must also overcome his opponents' dirty tactics. Most notably, they have finally, after 2½ years of preliminary skirmishes, succeeded in dragging him to court on charges of hate speech and incitement to hatred. The public prosecutor's case against Wilders opens in Amsterdam on January 20; if convicted, Wilders faces a fine of up to US$14,000 or as many as 16 months in jail.
    वाइल्डर्स को अपने विरोधियों की गन्दी चालों से भी पार पाना होगा। सबसे महत्वपूर्ण तो यही कि ढाई वर्ष के आरम्भिक टकराव के बाद वे उन्हें घृणात्मक वक्तव्य और घृणा फैलाने के आरोप में न्यायालय में घसीटने में सफल हो गये हैं। अभियोजन पक्ष की ओर से मामला 20 जनवरी को एम्सटर्डम में आरम्भ होगा और यदि उन पर अभियोग सिद्ध होता है तो वाइल्डर्स पर 14,000 अमेरिकी डालर का जुर्माना या फिर 16 माह जेल की सजा होगी।
  • Summing up his whole outlook, Kreidie has said that for American Arabs and Muslims, working with the FBI is “a waste of time.” How, then, did this anti-counterterrorism, anti-Bush, anti-Ashcroft, anti-FBI figure exactly help in “identifying, preventing and disrupting acts of terrorism”? Presented with this record of Kreidie's remarks, the Philadelphia FBI office declined to comment. When a leading law enforcement agency like the FBI is so politically exposed that it rewards those who attack it, winning the war on terror appears increasingly remote. The police need to do their work and not hobble themselves by honoring their opponents.
    दूसरा क्रीडी बुश प्रशासन की बुरी तरह आलोचना करता है. उसकी दृष्टि में राष्ट्रपति बुश और उनके महान्यायवादी जाँन एशक्राफ्ट ने मानवाधिकारों पर हमला बोल रखा है. जिसकी वह निन्दा करता है. उसने बुश पर आरोप लगाया है कि वह अरब विरोधी और मुस्लिम विरोधी कार्यों को दुहरा रहे हैं. उसने एक अवसर पर तो महान्यायवादी (जो अपने अन्य दायित्वों के अतिरिक्त विदेशों में एफ.बी.आई का काम भी देखते हैं) को मूर्ख एशक्राफ्ट कहा.
  • Analogy to Algeria : The Algerian army's intervened in the political process in 1992, just as Islamists there appeared to be on course to winning elections; this offers a comparison to the current situation in Egypt and raises the prospect of years of civil insurrection. But the analogy is not useful for Algeria experienced nothing like the mass opposition to Muslim Brotherhood rule in Egypt. It would be surprising if the Egyptian Islamists resorted to violence after their earlier experiences with this tactic and after seeing the vast numbers of their engaged opponents.
    अल्जीरिया का उदाहरण : 1992 में जब इस्लामवादी चुनाव जीतने वाले थे तो सेना ने राजनीतिक प्रक्रिया में हस्तक्षेप किया ; मिस्र की वर्तमान स्थिति से इसकी तुलना की जा सकती है और इससे अनेक वर्षों तक नागरिक विप्लव की सम्भावना बनती दिख रही है। परंतु यह उदाहरण अल्जीरिया के लिये उपयोगी नहीं है क्योंकि अल्जीरिया में ऐसा कोई विरोध नहीं हुआ जैसा कि मिस्र में मुस्लिम ब्रदरहुड के विरुद्ध जनता ने विरोध किया। यह आश्चर्यजनक होगा कि अपने पुराने अनुभव को देखते हुए और अपने विरोधियों को व्यापक रूप से उलझे हुए देखकर मिस्र के इस्लामवादी हिंसा पर उतर आयें।
  • While the learned people in our country knew of the contribution of Prophet Muhammad, our neighbors today given regular doses of misinformation about the Prophet and Sharia, the path of the Prophet, more commonly described as Islamic law. Sound Vision then soars into flights of fancy about the biography of Muhammad, applying twenty-first-century mores to a seventh-century figure; note especially the bizarre and inaccurate references to “a mass peace movement” and “not more than six days.” Prophet Muhammad envisioned a just and peaceful society. With a mass peace movement, he achieved this goal during his life. He hated war and always preferred a peace treaty with his opponents, even if it was not favorable to his and his followers' interests. He established his first peace sanctuary in the city of Madinah without any war whatsoever. While he did fight to defend that peace sanctuary, it is critical to note that the total time of actual fighting defending his people was not more than six days in his life of 63 years. He struggled to secure a peace that ensured justice and liberation for all people, especially for those most marginalized and oppressed. Comment on this item
    यह निष्कर्ष मेरी इस सामान्य धारणा को पुष्ट करता है और साथ ही Islamist Watch प्रकल्प की सार्थकता को भी प्रमाणित करता है कि इस्लामवादी व्यवस्था में रहते हुए धीरे-धीरे काम करके उससे अधिक सफलता प्राप्त कर रहे हैं जो वे शत्रुता या जंगली तरीके से प्राप्त कर सकते हैं। अंततः नरम इस्लामवाद हिंसक इस्लामवाद के समानांतर ही महान खतरा उत्पन्न करता है।
  • Should Erdoğan lose electoral approval, look for him to adopt nondemocratic means to stay in power. He outlined this course even before becoming prime minister, famously declaring that “Democracy is like a streetcar. When you come to your stop, you get off.” His proto-dictatorial mentality can already be seen in such steps as challenging the independent judiciary , fostering nonsensical conspiracy theories to jail his opponents, imprisoning countless journalists and issuing preposterous fines against unfriendly media companies . These autocratic ways are growing over time.
    यदि एरडोगन अपनी नीतियों के लिये चुनावी समर्थन नहीं प्राप्त करते तो क्या वे सत्ता में बने रहने के लिये गैर लोकतांत्रिक तरीका अपनायेंगे। उन्होंने इसका खुलासा प्रधानमंत्री बनने से पूर्व ही कर दिया था जब काफी प्रसिद्ध बात कही थी, “ लोकतंत्र सडक की कार की भाँति है जब आप अपने गंतव्य पर पहुँचें तो उतर जायें”। उनकी परा अधिनायकवादी मानसिकता के दर्शन अभी होते हैं जैसे कि स्वतंत्र न्यायपालिका को चुनौती देना, अपने विरोधियों को जेल में भेजने के लिये मूर्खतापूर्ण षड्यंत्रकारी सिद्दांतों को गढना , अनगिनत पत्रकारों को जेल में भेजना और अमित्र मीडिया कम्पनियों पर भारी भरकम जुर्माना लगाना। ये अधिनायकवादी तरीके दिनों दिन बढ रहे हैं।
  • Lo and behold, Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood have followed exactly our script. Since taking power in August, Morsi (1) sidelined the military, then focused on entrenching and expanding their supremacy, most notably by issuing a series of orders on Nov. 22 that arrogated autocratic powers to him and spreading Zionist conspiracy theories about his opponents. He then (2) rammed through an Islamist-oriented constitution on Nov. 30 and called a snap referendum on it Dec. 15. Consumed with these two tasks, he virtually ignored the myriad issues afflicting Egypt, especially the looming economic crisis and the lack of funds to pay for imported food.
    मोर्सी और मुस्लिम ब्रदरहुड ने ठीक हमारी पटकथा को अपनाया है । अगस्त में सत्ता में आने के बाद से मोर्सी ने (1) सेना को किनारे लगाया, फिर उनकी शक्ति को कम करते हुए अपनी प्रमुखता स्थापित करने की दिशा में कदम बढाया और इसी क्रम में 22 नवम्बर को अनेक आदेश जारी किये जिससे कि उन्हें अधिनायकवादी शक्तियाँ प्राप्त होती हैं और अपने विरोधियों के बारे में इजरायलवादी षडयंत्रकारी सिद्दांत का प्रचार होता है। (2) इसके बाद 30 नवम्बर को इस्लामवाद समर्थक संविधान की चोट करते हुए इसके लिये व्यापक जनमत संग्रह के लिये 15 दिस्म्बर की तिथि घोषित कर दी। इन दो मुद्दों में व्यस्त रहते हुए उन्होंने प्रायः उन सभी व्यापक मुद्दों की अवहेलना की जो कि मिस्र के लिये आवश्यक हैं विशेष रूप से तेजी से बढता आर्थिक संकट और खाद्य आयात के लिये वित्त की कमी।
  • Instead, as the U.S. Army recommends, MEK members should (after giving assurances not to attack Iranian territory) be permitted enough arms to protect themselves from their Iranian opponents. And in November, when the secretary of state next decides whether or not to re-certify the MEK as a terrorist group, he should come to the sensible conclusion that it poses no threat to the security of the United States or its citizens, and remove it from the list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Finally, because Iran's mullahs irrationally fear the MeK (as shown by their 1988 massacre in the jails of Iran of 10,000 long-imprisoned MeK members and supporters), maintaining the MeK as an organized group in separate camps in Iraq offers an excellent way to intimidate and gain leverage over Tehran.
    इसके बजाय अमेरिकी सेना को संस्तुति करनी चाहिए कि मुजाहिदीने खल्क के सदस्यों को ईरानी प्रतिद्वन्द्वियों से रक्षा के लिए पर्याप्त शस्त्र देने चाहिए। और नवम्बर में जब अगले राज्य सचिव इस बारे में निर्णय करें कि मुजाहिदीने खल्क को आतंकवादी गुट के रुप में फिर माना जाये या नहीं तो उन्हें बुद्धिमता पूर्ण निष्कर्ष पर आना चाहिए कि यह गुट अमेरिका, उसके नागरिकों के लिए कोई खतरा उत्पन्न नहीं करता इसलिए इसे विदेशी आतंकवादी संगठन की सूची से हटा दिया जाना चाहिए। अन्त में चूंकि ईरान के मुल्ला अतार्किक ढंग से मुजाहिदीने खल्फ से भयभीत हैं ( 1988 में जेल में बन्द मुजाहिदीने खल्फ के 10,000 सदस्यों का नरसंहार ) और यह देखते हुए कि मुजाहिदीने खल्क एक संगठित गुट के रूप में इराक के विभिन्न शिविरों में उपस्थित हैं एक विलक्षण अवसर प्रदान करता है कि तेहरान पर दबाव बनाया जाये और डराया जाये।
  • If the advisory board is not the ideal solution, it is the best to be hoped for at the moment, given the power of the higher-education lobby. I am ready to give H.R. 3077 a chance. But should the board not come into existence or fail to make a difference, I'll advocate the better solution - defunding - and work to spread these ideas among the public and in Congress. My opponents will then learn what happens when truly I am “actively pushing” for Congress to adopt a measure. Comment by Martin Kramer in his “ Sandbox ” commentary: Pipes on HR3077 . Daniel Pipes devotes his column this morning to HR3077. Reminder: the bill would create an advisory board for the Title VI program of government subsidies to area studies at universities. The bill's radical opponents, especially Arab and Muslim advocacy groups, have portrayed Pipes as a prime initiator or backer of the bill. But Pipes, who now serves on the board of the U.S. Institute of Peace, and once served on the Fulbright board, hasn't been a great believer in HR3077. Nor has he been an activist for it. Truth is, he doesn't think much of such boards. Pipes would rather defund Title VI, or divert its post-9/11 windfall to an alternative network of centers devoted to terrorism studies. For now, he's willing to give the board idea a chance. Since I strongly support HR3077, I'm grateful for his endorsement, however reserved. But if the board isn't created, or fails to effect any change, he promises to launch a defunding campaign. Should that happen, I'll be right behind him. Tue, Feb 24 2004 9:45 am Related Topics: Academia , Middle East studies , US politics receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item
    यदि सलाहकार बोर्ड उपयुक्त समाधान नहीं है तो मेरी दृष्टि में उच्च शिक्षा लाबी को कुछ समय के लिये इसका अधिकार दिया जाना चाहिये। मैं H.R 3077 को एक अवसर देने के पक्ष में हूँ और इसके लिये कांग्रेस और लोगों में जनमत बनाने का आग्रह करूँगा । तब मेरे विरोधियों को पता चलेगा कि कांग्रेस को एक समाधान के साथ सक्रिय रूप से कार्य करने का क्या असर होना है।
  • Western Islamist organizations until now have relentlessly attacked, successfully extracting apologies from media figures like Paul Harvey and Mortimer Zuckerman, from businesses like Amazon and Nike, from pastors, columnists, and even from state politicians, a top U.S. general, and the president of the United States. Never before have they apologized for having libeled someone. The CIC retraction breaks the Islamists' spell of privilege and their miasma of immunity. It establishes, at least in Canada and at present, that Islamist groups do not have impunity to fabricate lies about their opponents. The rule of law does prevail and it applies even to them. For those who fear the growth of radical Islam, this episode offers encouragement that its forces can be contained and defeated. I hope others will join me in standing up to the new totalitarianism. Comment on this item
    कनाडियन इस्लामिक कांग्रेस का यह कदम मेरे स्मरण में अभूतपूर्व है .पश्चिम के इस्लामवादी संगठन अबतक लगातार आक्रमण ही करते रहे हैं तथा मीडिया से जुड़े विभिन्न लोगों जैसे पाल हार्वे , मारटीमर जकरमैन , अमेजन और नाईक जैसे व्यवसायी संगठनों ,पादरियों , स्तंभकारों , राजनेताओं , उच्च श्रेणी के अमेरिका के जेनरल और अमेरिका के राष्ट्रपति तक को माफी मांगने के लिए विवश कर चुके हैं. इससे पहले कभी उन्होंने ( इस्लामवादी ) मान हानि के लिए माफी नहीं मांगी थी. कनाडियन इस्लामिक कांग्रेस द्वारा बयान वापस लेने की घटना इस्लामवादियों के विशेषाधिकार के दंभ और छूट प्राप्त करने की मानसिकता को तोड़ती है. कम से कम कनाडा में यह स्थापित हुआ है कि इस्लामवादियों को अपने विरोधियों के विरुद्ध झूठ बोलने की छूट प्राप्त नहीं है. कानून का राज उनपर भी लागू होता है. जो लोग कट्टरपंथी इस्लाम के विकास को लेकर चिंतित हैं उनके लिए यह उत्साहवर्धक होगा कि कट्टरपंथी इस्लाम को भी रोका जा सकता है और पराजित किया जा सकता है. मुझे आशा है कि इस अधिनायकवाद के विरुद्ध अन्य लोग भी मेरे साथ खड़े होंगे.
  • May 30, 2011 update :Balyoz keeps rolling along: less than two weeks before the general elections comes news today that Gen. Bilgin Balanlı , commander of the War Academies, has been arrested, making him the highest ranking active duty officer yet hauled off to prison. More broadly, 29 out of approximately 300 flag officers are under arrest. The deprivation of liberty of the 250 detained defendants in the Balyoz or Sledgehammer cases is arbitrary. … Consequent upon the opinion rendered, the Working Group requests the Government of Turkey to remedy the situation of these 250 persons in accordance with the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The Working Group considers that, taking into account all the circumstances of the case, an adequate remedy would be an enforceable right to compensation. Aug. 5, 2013 update : Despite the weakness and fraud of its case, the AKP government has plowed ahead and today pronounced prison sentences in the other plot, the Ergenekon one dating from 2007. It includes top military officers, opposition politicians, and journalists. As Hürriyet Daily News summarizes the case, “A total of 275 suspects, 66 of them under arrest, were awaiting rulings this morning. Some 33 indictments have been submitted in the course of the Ergenekon trials, which saw over 130 witnesses testify at hearings.” The most spectacular piece of news is the life sentence given the former chief of general staff, İlker Başbuğ, but the list is a long and severe one. An excerpt from the Hürriyet Daily News article: Journalist Tuncay Özkan, retired general Veli Küçük and lawyer Kemal Kerinçsiz were sentenced to aggravated life sentences. Özkan was also sentenced to an additional 16 years. Workers' Party leader Doğu Perinçek received aggravated life sentence and an additional 30 years in prison. Retired colonel Fikri Karadağ and retired general Hasan Ataman Yıldırım also received aggravated life sentences. Retired General Hurşit Tolon was sentenced to life in prison while another retired General Levent Ersöz was sentenced to 22 years six months. The court handed down life sentences to the retired generals Hasan Iğsız and Nusret Taşdelen, as well as retired colonel Fuat Selvi. … Writer Yalçın Küçük was also sentenced to 22 years and six months in prison. On similar charges, the court sentenced former head of the Higher Education Board of Turkey (YÖK) Kemal Gürüz to 13 years and 11 months, historian Mehmet Perinçek, who is the son of Doğu Perinçek, to six years, and alleged mob leader Sedat Peker was given a 10 year sentence. Former North Sea Field Commander Mehmet Otuzbiroğlu was sentenced to 20 years and 6 months. Journalist Erol Manisalı was sentenced to nine years. Author Ergün Poyraz was handed down a 29 years and four months sentence while journalist Güler Kömürcü was sentenced to seven years and six months. Workers' Party (İP) executives Hayrettin Ertekin was sentenced to 16 years, Hikmet Çiçek was sentenced to 21 years and nine months. The party's lawyer Emcet Olcaytu received 13 years and two months. Former rectors Ferit Bernay and Mustafa Abbas were each sentenced to ten years in prison. … Former police chief Adil Serdar Saçan was sentenced to 14 years in prison. Former mayor Gürbüz Çapan received one year. Comment : Seen in the light of June's Gezi Park demonstrations, these sentences imply that Erdoğan is further doubling down to discredit, marginalize, and criminalize his political opponents. It's not a tactic that will end well for him. Related Topics: Turkey and Turks receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item
    तुर्की का इस्लामी मह्त्व इस बात की ओर संकेत करता है इस संकट का सभी मुसलमानों के लिये मह्त्व है। एकेपी द्वारा सेना पर इस्लामवादी नियंत्रण का अर्थ है कि वे उम्मा के सर्वाधिक शक्तिशाली सेक्युलर संस्थान को नियंत्रित कर रहे है और कुछ क्षणों के लिये ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि उन्हें रोक पाना कठिन है। लेकिन यदि सेना अपनी स्वतंत्रता बचा पाती है तो अतातुर्क का विचार मुस्लिम समाज में जीवित रहेगा विश्वस्तर पर मुसलमानों के लिये व्यापक इस्लामवाद के लिये एक विकल्प मिल सकेगा।

opponents sentences in Hindi. What are the example sentences for opponents? opponents English meaning, translation, pronunciation, synonyms and example sentences are provided by Hindlish.com.